• Tentang UGM
  • Portal Akademik
  • Pusat TI
  • Perpustakaan
  • Penelitian
Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • About Us
    • About CRCS
    • Vision & Mission
    • People
      • Faculty Members and Lecturers
      • Staff Members
      • Students
      • Alumni
    • Facilities
    • Library
  • Master’s Program
    • Overview
    • Curriculum
    • Courses
    • Schedule
    • Admission
    • Scholarship
    • Accreditation and Certification
    • Academic Collaborations
      • Crossculture Religious Studies Summer School
      • Florida International University
    • Academic Documents
    • Student Satisfaction Survey
  • Article
    • Perspective
    • Book Review
    • Event Report
    • Class Journal
    • Interview
    • Wed Forum Report
    • Thesis Review
    • News
  • Publication
    • Reports
    • Books
    • Newsletter
    • Monthly Update
    • Infographic
  • Research
    • CRCS Researchs
    • Resource Center
  • Community Engagement
    • Film
      • Indonesian Pluralities
      • Our Land is the Sea
    • Wednesday Forum
    • ICIR
    • Amerta Movement
  • Beranda
  • Thesis Review
  • The Crucifixion of Yesus : A Theological Debate between Christians and Muslims

The Crucifixion of Yesus : A Theological Debate between Christians and Muslims

  • Thesis Review
  • 20 May 2010, 00.00
  • Oleh:
  • 0
Title : The Crucifixion of Yesus (A Theological Debate between Christians and Muslims)
Author : Dian Nur Anna (CRCS, 2004)
Abstract
The crucifixion of Jesus is an issue which compare from Christian and Muslim perspectives. This is based on both religious arguments about the crucifixion of Jesus with support from both scriptures. It is problematic also because their scriptures explain about this issue ambiguously. This issue still arises in both Christians and Muslims because they have opinion not only based on the scripture itself, but also influenced by historical discoveries and the interpretation of scriptures when the issue was raised, especially about the crucifixion of Jesus.
I explain the crucifixion of Jesus in synthesis methods or an academic-cum doctriner or scientific-cum-suigeneric perspective. This view means that the crucifixion of Jesus can be understand from many dimensions. It does not only talk about doctrine itself, but also includes the history where the crucifixion of Jesus happened, and its eschatological impact. I research the crucifixion of Jesus looking for what happened on the cross based on Christian and Muslim sources.
The crucifixion of Jesus is an event that involves theological issues, because these events include also the divinity aspect, and automatically includes the role God plays. It relates to the position of Jesus in Christian belief that Jesus did not only have position as human, but also as God. These views influence the way of thinking of Christians. In the theological aspect, actually, according to Christian and Muslim perspectives.
Beside the theological issue, the event of crucifixion is also the issue of history, because theology is not separate from history and the event was a long time ago and it is impossible to reconstruct what happened clearly. The authenticity of this event is debatable if we only try to look at the ordinary data. The historical aspects of the crucifixion of Jesus include the event and participants of crucifixion. The crucifixion of Jesus is an issue in eschatology in Christian and Muslim perspectives. In this part, I separated Jesus’ first coming and second coming. The first coming means that Jesus came, as a messiah this is part of the purpose that Jesus must die. This means that one of the reasons to accuse Jesus is Jesus as the Messiah. This is included in the eschatological issue. The second coming means that Jesus came again after he died.
In this thesis, I also try to illustrate how Christians and Muslims talk about the crucifixion of Jesus and the possibility to make an understandable between both religions. The crucifixion of Jesus is not debatable in Christianity. Christianity believes that Jesus was dead on the cross for salvation. Islam, as a religion beginning after Christianity, also respects Jesus, especially the death of Jesus. Muslims have different opinions about the death of Jesus. I have divided them into two groups. The first group believes that Jesus did not crucify and did not die on the cross. The second groups of Muslims agree that Jesus crucified, but maintain that he did not die on the cross.
Although among Christian and Muslim followers there are different arguments about the crucifixion of Jesus, both religions have similarities in the crucifixion of Jesus and there is the possibility to mutual understanding between them. That means both Christian and Muslim opinions about the crucifixion of Jesus can be compared and we can look a similarity, especially about the circle of crucifixion of Jesus. Both religions believe in the event of crucifixion and argue that the event of crucifixion is really accord, argue that Jesus is a prophet, a redeemer, a savior, that he died with divine love and divine triumph, the honor of God, and the dignity of humanity.
Based on my thesis, I can know the meaning of crucifixion of Jesus from both Christians and Muslims. For Christians, the meaning of crucifixion of Jesus is a proof of love and triumph of God. Jesus is an incarnation of God dead to redeem a great sin of human being and he was resurrected.
For Muslims, the meaning of crucifixion of Jesus is a proof of love and triumph of God. God save Jesus from death on the cross with take Jesus beside God. Then, Muslims can understand how God sent Jesus as human to redeem human beings and God loves Jesus as a prophet with special status.

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Instagram

crcs_ugm

Sedang tidak baik-baik saja, kamu biasanya mencari Sedang tidak baik-baik saja, kamu biasanya mencari apa di internet?

Banyak anak muda hari ini menemukan ketenangan, nasihat, bahkan jawaban atas kegelisahan melalui media sosial, konten keagamaan, akun kesehatan mental, hingga AI chatbot. Namun, bagaimana sebenarnya pengalaman itu terjadi?
Kami sedang melakukan penelitian untuk memahami bagaimana generasi muda usia 10–24 tahun mencari informasi keagamaan maupun kesehatan mental saat menghadapi masa-masa sulit.
Jika kamu merasa topik ini dekat dengan pengalamanmu, kami mengundangmu menjadi responden.
Partisipasi bersifat sukarela dan seluruh jawaban dijaga kerahasiaannya.
Kamu bisa langsung kirim DM jawabanmu atau mau tanya-tanya dulu juga boleh.

Kami tunggu ya.
Katanja koeliah S2 itoe mahal? Eitss , djangan s Katanja  koeliah S2 itoe mahal? 
Eitss , djangan salah
Bersama keempat mahasiswa angkatan 2025, kita akan ngobrolin djoeroes-djoeroes djitoe mendapatkan beasiswa di CRCS UGM

Begitoe?
Before petroleum fueled the world, it fractured th Before petroleum fueled the world, it fractured the archipelago

The raise of the colonial petroleum industry in the Dutch East Indies was also the emergence of new spatial inequalities. Outer Java was not merely discovered as a resource zone. It was politically produced as an extractive territory through imperial concessions, colonial state-building, and global struggles over resource control.

Join us in this presentation on capitalism, oil, and the colonial fractures that continue to haunt the geography of modern Indonesia. We provide snacks and drinks, don't forget to bring your tumbler. This event is free and open to public.
M B G Satu kotak makan berisi nasi putih pulen seb M B G
Satu kotak makan berisi nasi putih pulen sebagai sumber karbohidrat utama, dimasak dari beras medium pilihan, air, sedikit garam, dan beberapa tetes minyak agar tidak cepat basi. Di sampingnya terdapat ayam semur kecap, dibuat dari potongan daging ayam, bawang merah, bawang putih, kecap manis, daun salam, lengkuas, garam, dan sedikit gula sehingga memberi asupan protein hewani yang cukup untuk pertumbuhan. Sebagai pendamping lauk utama, disediakan tempe orek manis gurih dari tempe iris tipis, bawang merah, bawang putih, cabai, kecap, dan gula merah. Tempe ini berfungsi menambah protein nabati sekaligus membuat kotak makan tampak lebih penuh, sebab protein memang sering lebih meyakinkan bila hadir rangkap dua. Untuk unsur sayuran, ada tumis wortel dan buncis yang dimasak dari wortel segar, buncis, sedikit kol, bawang putih, garam, merica, dan minyak sayur. Warna oranye-hijau pada sayur ini penting: bukan hanya untuk vitamin A dan serat, tetapi juga agar foto dokumentasi tidak terlihat terlalu pucat.Sebagai pelengkap vitamin alami, satu buah pisang atau sepotong pepaya matang diletakkan di sudut kotak. Buah dipilih yang murah, tahan banting, tidak gampang memar, dan cukup fotogenik ketika dibagikan massal. Terakhir, ditambahkan susu UHT kotak kecil berbahan susu sapi, gula, dan fortifikasi vitamin, atau kadang telur rebus utuh sebagai penutup protein tambahan.

Berbuih-buih seperti pelaksanaannya ...
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets by crcsugm

Universitas Gadjah Mada

Gedung Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM, 3rd Floor
Jl. Teknika Utara, Pogung, Yogyakarta, 55284
Email address: crcs@ugm.ac.id

 

© CRCS - Universitas Gadjah Mada

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY