• Tentang UGM
  • Portal Akademik
  • Pusat TI
  • Perpustakaan
  • Penelitian
Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • About Us
    • About CRCS
    • Vision & Mission
    • People
      • Faculty Members and Lecturers
      • Staff Members
      • Students
      • Alumni
    • Facilities
    • Library
  • Master’s Program
    • Overview
    • Curriculum
    • Courses
    • Schedule
    • Admission
    • Scholarship
    • Accreditation and Certification
    • Academic Collaborations
      • Crossculture Religious Studies Summer School
      • Florida International University
    • Academic Documents
    • Student Satisfaction Survey
  • Article
    • Perspective
    • Book Review
    • Event Report
    • Class Journal
    • Interview
    • Wed Forum Report
    • Thesis Review
    • News
  • Publication
    • Reports
    • Books
    • Newsletter
    • Monthly Update
    • Infographic
  • Research
    • CRCS Researchs
    • Resource Center
  • Community Engagement
    • Film
      • Indonesian Pluralities
      • Our Land is the Sea
    • Wednesday Forum
    • ICIR
    • Amerta Movement
  • Beranda
  • Thesis Review
  • Scientific Interpretation Concerning Creation of Man in the Bible and the Qur'an

Scientific Interpretation Concerning Creation of Man in the Bible and the Qur'an

  • Thesis Review
  • 15 June 2011, 00.00
  • Oleh:
  • 0

Title: Scientific Interpretation Concerning Creation of Man in the Bible and the Qur’án

Author: Suparjo (CRCS, 2004)

Keywords: God, creation, evolution, interpretation, and theology

Abstract:

 

The Bible and the Qur’án use various terms and descriptions concerning creation of man. On the one hand, both scriptures describe direct and instant creation of man by God; but on the other hand, both describe gradual creation of man that reveals continuing creation. This makes people of those scriptures become different in understanding it.

 

Generally, Christian and Muslim theologians can be divided into two groups. The first group mostly consists of scriptural literalists who understand the scriptures as books of science. They understand some scriptural stories as historical fact, i.e. the story of creation of man. They believe that God, which they describe as personal and anthropomorphic God, directly created origin of human beings; while Adam from clay, Eve from a left rib of Adam. The second group mostly consists of contemporary theologians who understand the scriptures as books of faith, not book of science. They understand some scriptural descriptions as myths or symbols. They understand the story of creation of man as symbolical expression of glorification of God and human relation with Him. They do not understand such story literally so that they promote that human beings come to the earth through evolutionary process controlled by God.

 

The coming of the theory of evolution also influences Christian and Muslim theologians’ views about creation of man. Many of them try to show that scriptural descriptions concerning creation of man are valid, whereas the theory of evolution is false. They support their idea with scientific data. The most extreme of them promote creationism that understands that God directly created origin of human species. Many others try to understand that between scriptural concepts of creation of man and the theory of evolution are meeting points. Many of them even try to integrate those two ideas. They understand scriptural concepts of creation scientifically; vice verse, they understand the theory of evolution theistically. They promote contemporary theologies, such as natural theology, theology of nature, and synthetic theology. As the result, they understand that the process of evolution is a way that which God created human beings.

 

Their effort to integrate between both always develops. The integrative explanation today may be revised in the next time because there are still many arguments that have not given satisfying explanation for theological problems, such as salvation and evils, for people who understand that those both ideas—evolution and creation—are true yet. However, they principally understand that God involves in the natural processes.

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Instagram

crcs_ugm

Sedang tidak baik-baik saja, kamu biasanya mencari Sedang tidak baik-baik saja, kamu biasanya mencari apa di internet?

Banyak anak muda hari ini menemukan ketenangan, nasihat, bahkan jawaban atas kegelisahan melalui media sosial, konten keagamaan, akun kesehatan mental, hingga AI chatbot. Namun, bagaimana sebenarnya pengalaman itu terjadi?
Kami sedang melakukan penelitian untuk memahami bagaimana generasi muda usia 10–24 tahun mencari informasi keagamaan maupun kesehatan mental saat menghadapi masa-masa sulit.
Jika kamu merasa topik ini dekat dengan pengalamanmu, kami mengundangmu menjadi responden.
Partisipasi bersifat sukarela dan seluruh jawaban dijaga kerahasiaannya.
Kamu bisa langsung kirim DM jawabanmu atau mau tanya-tanya dulu juga boleh.

Kami tunggu ya.
Katanja koeliah S2 itoe mahal? Eitss , djangan s Katanja  koeliah S2 itoe mahal? 
Eitss , djangan salah
Bersama keempat mahasiswa angkatan 2025, kita akan ngobrolin djoeroes-djoeroes djitoe mendapatkan beasiswa di CRCS UGM

Begitoe?
Before petroleum fueled the world, it fractured th Before petroleum fueled the world, it fractured the archipelago

The raise of the colonial petroleum industry in the Dutch East Indies was also the emergence of new spatial inequalities. Outer Java was not merely discovered as a resource zone. It was politically produced as an extractive territory through imperial concessions, colonial state-building, and global struggles over resource control.

Join us in this presentation on capitalism, oil, and the colonial fractures that continue to haunt the geography of modern Indonesia. We provide snacks and drinks, don't forget to bring your tumbler. This event is free and open to public.
M B G Satu kotak makan berisi nasi putih pulen seb M B G
Satu kotak makan berisi nasi putih pulen sebagai sumber karbohidrat utama, dimasak dari beras medium pilihan, air, sedikit garam, dan beberapa tetes minyak agar tidak cepat basi. Di sampingnya terdapat ayam semur kecap, dibuat dari potongan daging ayam, bawang merah, bawang putih, kecap manis, daun salam, lengkuas, garam, dan sedikit gula sehingga memberi asupan protein hewani yang cukup untuk pertumbuhan. Sebagai pendamping lauk utama, disediakan tempe orek manis gurih dari tempe iris tipis, bawang merah, bawang putih, cabai, kecap, dan gula merah. Tempe ini berfungsi menambah protein nabati sekaligus membuat kotak makan tampak lebih penuh, sebab protein memang sering lebih meyakinkan bila hadir rangkap dua. Untuk unsur sayuran, ada tumis wortel dan buncis yang dimasak dari wortel segar, buncis, sedikit kol, bawang putih, garam, merica, dan minyak sayur. Warna oranye-hijau pada sayur ini penting: bukan hanya untuk vitamin A dan serat, tetapi juga agar foto dokumentasi tidak terlihat terlalu pucat.Sebagai pelengkap vitamin alami, satu buah pisang atau sepotong pepaya matang diletakkan di sudut kotak. Buah dipilih yang murah, tahan banting, tidak gampang memar, dan cukup fotogenik ketika dibagikan massal. Terakhir, ditambahkan susu UHT kotak kecil berbahan susu sapi, gula, dan fortifikasi vitamin, atau kadang telur rebus utuh sebagai penutup protein tambahan.

Berbuih-buih seperti pelaksanaannya ...
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets by crcsugm

Universitas Gadjah Mada

Gedung Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM, 3rd Floor
Jl. Teknika Utara, Pogung, Yogyakarta, 55284
Email address: crcs@ugm.ac.id

 

© CRCS - Universitas Gadjah Mada

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY