• Tentang UGM
  • Portal Akademik
  • Pusat TI
  • Perpustakaan
  • Penelitian
Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • About Us
    • About CRCS
    • Vision & Mission
    • People
      • Faculty Members and Lecturers
      • Staff Members
      • Students
      • Alumni
    • Facilities
    • Library
  • Master’s Program
    • Overview
    • Curriculum
    • Courses
    • Schedule
    • Admission
    • Scholarship
    • Accreditation and Certification
    • Academic Collaborations
      • Crossculture Religious Studies Summer School
      • Florida International University
    • Academic Documents
    • Student Satisfaction Survey
  • Article
    • Perspective
    • Book Review
    • Event Report
    • Class Journal
    • Interview
    • Wed Forum Report
    • Thesis Review
    • News
  • Publication
    • Reports
    • Books
    • Newsletter
    • Monthly Update
    • Infographic
  • Research
    • CRCS Researchs
    • Resource Center
  • Community Engagement
    • Film
      • Indonesian Pluralities
      • Our Land is the Sea
    • Wednesday Forum
    • ICIR
    • Amerta Movement
  • Beranda
  • Thesis Review
  • Scientific Interpretation Concerning Creation of Man in the Bible and the Qur'an

Scientific Interpretation Concerning Creation of Man in the Bible and the Qur'an

  • Thesis Review
  • 15 June 2011, 00.00
  • Oleh:
  • 0

Title: Scientific Interpretation Concerning Creation of Man in the Bible and the Qur’án

Author: Suparjo (CRCS, 2004)

Keywords: God, creation, evolution, interpretation, and theology

Abstract:

 

The Bible and the Qur’án use various terms and descriptions concerning creation of man. On the one hand, both scriptures describe direct and instant creation of man by God; but on the other hand, both describe gradual creation of man that reveals continuing creation. This makes people of those scriptures become different in understanding it.

 

Generally, Christian and Muslim theologians can be divided into two groups. The first group mostly consists of scriptural literalists who understand the scriptures as books of science. They understand some scriptural stories as historical fact, i.e. the story of creation of man. They believe that God, which they describe as personal and anthropomorphic God, directly created origin of human beings; while Adam from clay, Eve from a left rib of Adam. The second group mostly consists of contemporary theologians who understand the scriptures as books of faith, not book of science. They understand some scriptural descriptions as myths or symbols. They understand the story of creation of man as symbolical expression of glorification of God and human relation with Him. They do not understand such story literally so that they promote that human beings come to the earth through evolutionary process controlled by God.

 

The coming of the theory of evolution also influences Christian and Muslim theologians’ views about creation of man. Many of them try to show that scriptural descriptions concerning creation of man are valid, whereas the theory of evolution is false. They support their idea with scientific data. The most extreme of them promote creationism that understands that God directly created origin of human species. Many others try to understand that between scriptural concepts of creation of man and the theory of evolution are meeting points. Many of them even try to integrate those two ideas. They understand scriptural concepts of creation scientifically; vice verse, they understand the theory of evolution theistically. They promote contemporary theologies, such as natural theology, theology of nature, and synthetic theology. As the result, they understand that the process of evolution is a way that which God created human beings.

 

Their effort to integrate between both always develops. The integrative explanation today may be revised in the next time because there are still many arguments that have not given satisfying explanation for theological problems, such as salvation and evils, for people who understand that those both ideas—evolution and creation—are true yet. However, they principally understand that God involves in the natural processes.

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Instagram

B A T A S Ada momen ketika agama hadir sebagai ba B A T A S 
Ada momen ketika agama hadir sebagai bahasa terakhir untuk bertahan. Seperti perempuan-perempuan di Sudan yang mempertanyakan apakah bunuh diri bisa menjadi jalan pulang yang lebih manusiawi daripada hidup dalam kekerasan. Ini merupakan situasi ekstrem ketika dosa dan keselamatan tidak lagi nyata dalam keseharian sementara dunia memilih diam. Pada titik itu, mereka memilih untuk berbicara "langsung" kepada Tuhan melalui jalan yang kelam.

Simak refleksi @safinatul_aula tentang bunuh diri dan agensi "kesalehan" di situs web crcs
A N G K E R Makam menjadi ruang pisah antara yang A N G K E R
Makam menjadi ruang pisah antara yang hidup dan mati. Mereka yang masih bernyawa melanjutkan cerita, mereka yang mati bersemayam di makam. Pada titik ini, makam memisahkan antara yang sakral dan profan, yang adi kodrati dan yang sehari-hari. Namun, makam juga menjadi ruang jumpa antarkeduanya. Yang hidup menceritakan ulang kisah yang meninggal sehingga mendiang terus mengada. Selama kisah diceritakan dan nama terus diumbulkan ke langit, selama itu pula mereka mengabadi. Karenanya, makam itu angker, sebuah jangkar yang menakutkan dan menautkan sekaligus. 

Simak catatan lapangan @yohanes_leo27 terkait makam di situs web crcs.
GRWM bareng CRCS UGM batch 2025!!! GRWM bareng CRCS UGM batch 2025!!!
Does Indonesia have its own philosophers? Can Indo Does Indonesia have its own philosophers?
Can Indonesian thinkers really stand alongside Greece, the Arab world, or the West? Or is that the wrong question to begin with? From Tan Malaka to Nurcholish Madjid, from Abdurrahman Wahid to Azyumardi Azra, Indonesian thinkers have long been engaging, reworking, and transforming global ideas into something rooted in their own realities. 
Let’s unpack this together with @almakin_uinsuka.
Join the discussion at UGM Graduate School building, 3rd floor. We provide snacks and drinks, don't forget to bring your tumbler. This event is free and open to public.
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets by crcsugm

Universitas Gadjah Mada

Gedung Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM, 3rd Floor
Jl. Teknika Utara, Pogung, Yogyakarta, 55284
Email address: crcs@ugm.ac.id

 

© CRCS - Universitas Gadjah Mada

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY