• Tentang UGM
  • Portal Akademik
  • Pusat TI
  • Perpustakaan
  • Penelitian
Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • About Us
    • About CRCS
    • Vision & Mission
    • People
      • Faculty Members and Lecturers
      • Staff Members
      • Students
      • Alumni
    • Facilities
    • Library
  • Master’s Program
    • Overview
    • Curriculum
    • Courses
    • Schedule
    • Admission
    • Scholarship
    • Accreditation and Certification
    • Academic Collaborations
      • Crossculture Religious Studies Summer School
      • Florida International University
    • Student Satisfaction Survey
    • Academic Documents
  • Article
    • Perspective
    • Book Review
    • Event Report
    • Class Journal
    • Interview
    • Wed Forum Report
    • Thesis Review
    • News
  • Publication
    • Reports
    • Books
    • Newsletter
    • Monthly Update
    • Infographic
  • Research
    • CRCS Researchs
    • Resource Center
  • Community Engagement
    • Film
      • Indonesian Pluralities
      • Our Land is the Sea
    • Wednesday Forum
    • ICIR
    • Amerta Movement
  • Beranda
  • Thesis Review
  • Interfaith Dialogue in Indonesian Public Diplomacy

Interfaith Dialogue in Indonesian Public Diplomacy

  • Thesis Review
  • 15 June 2011, 00.00
  • Oleh:
  • 0
Title : Interfaith Dialogue in Indonesian Public Diplomacy: The Role of The Department of Foreign Affairs in Interfaith Dialogue
Author : Novita Rakhmawati (CRCS, 2009)
Keywords : religion, international relations, foreign policy, public diplomacy, interfaith dialogue, Indonesia, Department of Foreign Affairs
Abstract
In an era of globalization, especially in the wake of the Cold War and the September 11, 2001 tragedy, there is an increasing concern about the role of religion and religious actors in international relations (Haynes, 2007; Thomas, 2005; Petito and Hatzopoulos, 2003; Dark, 2000). Religion has become one of the new types of what is called “intermestic” (international and domestic) policy issue in international relations (Duncan, 2006, Kegley and Wittkopf, 2001). In the Indonesian context, scholars have tended to focus on the role of Islam in Indonesian foreign policy (Perwita, 2007; Sukma, 2003). However, the study of interfaith dialogue in Indonesian diplomacy, particularly in public diplomacy is a new development. This current paper examines interfaith dialogue activities in Indonesian public diplomacy.
The aim of the study is to describe interfaith dialogue programs and activities in recent Indonesian diplomacy and to examine why the Indonesian government, particularly through the Department of Foreign Affairs, has engaged with interfaith dialogue. This paper argues that the adoption of interfaith dialogue in Indonesian public diplomacy has been influenced by certain “intermestic” (international and domestic) circumstances. In the context of international challenges, these include globalization and the global resurgence of religion, the rise of issues of Islamic terrorism, U.S unilateralism and the rise of multitrack diplomacy. Regarding domestic circumstances there are constraints from the legal infrastructure and the lack of institutional capacity to counterterrorism, the crises of perception of “the West versus Islam”, the requirement for balancing the need to security and democratization and human’s rights protection, and the need to promote an image of Indonesia as the world’s largest Muslim population country, which is peaceful and tolerant.
The findings indicate that interfaith dialogue activities in Indonesian public diplomacy are a new and positive development in Indonesian diplomacy because it recognizes the role of religious communities in the foreign policy making process and have potential as Indonesian soft power. This fact led to a question whether there is shifting paradigm in Indonesian foreign policy i.e, religious consideration. However, Pancasila as the ideology of the state and the 1945 Constitution remain as the foundation of Indonesian foreign policy. The conclusion recommends that interfaith dialogue in Indonesian public diplomacy need to be more practical, engaging the grass root level and becoming more responsive to recent domestic and international circumstances.

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Instagram

A M P A T Baru kemarin, pemerintah YTTA melakukan A M P A T
Baru kemarin, pemerintah YTTA melakukan aksi simsalabim dengan mencabut empat konsesi tambang di salah satu gugusan Red Line. Aksi "heroik" itu terlihat janggal ketika perusahaan yang paling bermasalah dalam perusakan lingkungan, bahkan yang menjadi pusat viral, justru dilindungi. Tentu bukan karena cocokologi dengan nama Raja Ampat sehingga hanya empat perusahaan yang dicabut konsesinya. Bukan cocokologi juga ketika Raja Ampat akan menjadi lokus tesis yang akan diuji esok di CRCS UGM. Berkebalikan dengan aksi badut jahat di Raja Ampat, @patricia_kabes akan bercerita bagaimana komunitas masyarakat di Aduwei mengelola laut dengan lestari melalui sasi. Berangkat dari negeri timur, peraih beasiswa LPDP ini justru menjadi yang pertama di angkatannya untuk menambahkan dua huruf pada akhir namanya.
For people who learn religious studies, it is comm For people who learn religious studies, it is common to say that "religion", as a concept and category, is Western modern invention. It is European origin, exported globally through colonialism and Christian mission. Despite its noble intention to decolonize modern social categories, it suffers from historical inaccuracy. Precolonial Islamic Malay and Javanese texts in the 16th and 17th century reflect a strong sense of reified religion, one whose meaning closely resembles the modern concept.

Come and join @wednesdayforum discussion at UGM Graduate School building, 3rd floor. We provide snacks and drinks, don't forget to bring your tumbler. This event is free and open to public.
I N S P I R A S I Secara satir, penyandang disabil I N S P I R A S I
Secara satir, penyandang disabilitas baru mendapatkan sorotan ketika dia mampu berprestasi, mampu mengatasi segala rintangan dan kekurangan. Singkat kata, penyandang disabilitas kemudian menjadi sumber inspirasi bagi nondisabilitas. Budi Irawanto menyebutnya sebagai "inspirational porn". Simak ulasan lengkapnya di situs web crcs ugm.
Human are the creature who live between the mounta Human are the creature who live between the mountain and the sea. Yet, human are not the only one who live between the mountain and the sea. Human are the one who lives by absorbing what above and beneath the mountain and the sea. Yet, human are the same creature who disrupt and destroy the mountain, the sea, and everything between. Not all human, but always human. By exploring what/who/why/and how the life between the mountain and the sea is changing, we learn to collaborate and work together, human and non-human, for future generation—no matter what you belief, your cultural background.

Come and join @wednesdayforum with Arahmaiani at UGM Graduate School building, 3rd floor. We provide snacks and drinks, don't forget to bring your tumbler. This event is free and open to public.
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets by crcsugm

Universitas Gadjah Mada

Gedung Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM, 3rd Floor
Jl. Teknika Utara, Pogung, Yogyakarta, 55284
Email address: crcs@ugm.ac.id

 

© CRCS - Universitas Gadjah Mada

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY

[EN] We use cookies to help our viewer get the best experience on our website. -- [ID] Kami menggunakan cookie untuk membantu pengunjung kami mendapatkan pengalaman terbaik di situs web kami.I Agree / Saya Setuju