• Tentang UGM
  • Portal Akademik
  • Pusat TI
  • Perpustakaan
  • Penelitian
Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • About Us
    • About CRCS
    • Vision & Mission
    • People
      • Faculty Members and Lecturers
      • Staff Members
      • Students
      • Alumni
    • Facilities
    • Library
  • Master’s Program
    • Overview
    • Curriculum
    • Courses
    • Schedule
    • Admission
    • Scholarship
    • Accreditation and Certification
    • Academic Collaborations
      • Crossculture Religious Studies Summer School
      • Florida International University
    • Student Satisfaction Survey
    • Academic Documents
  • Article
    • Perspective
    • Book Review
    • Event Report
    • Class Journal
    • Interview
    • Wed Forum Report
    • Thesis Review
    • News
  • Publication
    • Reports
    • Books
    • Newsletter
    • Monthly Update
    • Infographic
  • Research
    • CRCS Researchs
    • Resource Center
  • Community Engagement
    • Film
      • Indonesian Pluralities
      • Our Land is the Sea
    • Wednesday Forum
    • ICIR
    • Amerta Movement
  • Beranda
  • Thesis Review
  • Scientific Interpretation Concerning Creation of Man in the Bible and the Qur'an

Scientific Interpretation Concerning Creation of Man in the Bible and the Qur'an

  • Thesis Review
  • 15 June 2011, 00.00
  • Oleh:
  • 0

Title: Scientific Interpretation Concerning Creation of Man in the Bible and the Qur’án

Author: Suparjo (CRCS, 2004)

Keywords: God, creation, evolution, interpretation, and theology

Abstract:

 

The Bible and the Qur’án use various terms and descriptions concerning creation of man. On the one hand, both scriptures describe direct and instant creation of man by God; but on the other hand, both describe gradual creation of man that reveals continuing creation. This makes people of those scriptures become different in understanding it.

 

Generally, Christian and Muslim theologians can be divided into two groups. The first group mostly consists of scriptural literalists who understand the scriptures as books of science. They understand some scriptural stories as historical fact, i.e. the story of creation of man. They believe that God, which they describe as personal and anthropomorphic God, directly created origin of human beings; while Adam from clay, Eve from a left rib of Adam. The second group mostly consists of contemporary theologians who understand the scriptures as books of faith, not book of science. They understand some scriptural descriptions as myths or symbols. They understand the story of creation of man as symbolical expression of glorification of God and human relation with Him. They do not understand such story literally so that they promote that human beings come to the earth through evolutionary process controlled by God.

 

The coming of the theory of evolution also influences Christian and Muslim theologians’ views about creation of man. Many of them try to show that scriptural descriptions concerning creation of man are valid, whereas the theory of evolution is false. They support their idea with scientific data. The most extreme of them promote creationism that understands that God directly created origin of human species. Many others try to understand that between scriptural concepts of creation of man and the theory of evolution are meeting points. Many of them even try to integrate those two ideas. They understand scriptural concepts of creation scientifically; vice verse, they understand the theory of evolution theistically. They promote contemporary theologies, such as natural theology, theology of nature, and synthetic theology. As the result, they understand that the process of evolution is a way that which God created human beings.

 

Their effort to integrate between both always develops. The integrative explanation today may be revised in the next time because there are still many arguments that have not given satisfying explanation for theological problems, such as salvation and evils, for people who understand that those both ideas—evolution and creation—are true yet. However, they principally understand that God involves in the natural processes.

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Instagram

For people who learn religious studies, it is comm For people who learn religious studies, it is common to say that "religion", as a concept and category, is Western modern invention. It is European origin, exported globally through colonialism and Christian mission. Despite its noble intention to decolonize modern social categories, it suffers from historical inaccuracy. Precolonial Islamic Malay and Javanese texts in the 16th and 17th century reflect a strong sense of reified religion, one whose meaning closely resembles the modern concept.

Come and join @wednesdayforum discussion at UGM Graduate School building, 3rd floor. We provide snacks and drinks, don't forget to bring your tumbler. This event is free and open to public.
I N S P I R A S I Secara satir, penyandang disabil I N S P I R A S I
Secara satir, penyandang disabilitas baru mendapatkan sorotan ketika dia mampu berprestasi, mampu mengatasi segala rintangan dan kekurangan. Singkat kata, penyandang disabilitas kemudian menjadi sumber inspirasi bagi nondisabilitas. Budi Irawanto menyebutnya sebagai "inspirational porn". Simak ulasan lengkapnya di situs web crcs ugm.
Human are the creature who live between the mounta Human are the creature who live between the mountain and the sea. Yet, human are not the only one who live between the mountain and the sea. Human are the one who lives by absorbing what above and beneath the mountain and the sea. Yet, human are the same creature who disrupt and destroy the mountain, the sea, and everything between. Not all human, but always human. By exploring what/who/why/and how the life between the mountain and the sea is changing, we learn to collaborate and work together, human and non-human, for future generation—no matter what you belief, your cultural background.

Come and join @wednesdayforum with Arahmaiani at UGM Graduate School building, 3rd floor. We provide snacks and drinks, don't forget to bring your tumbler. This event is free and open to public.
R A G A Ada beberapa definisi menarik tentang raga R A G A
Ada beberapa definisi menarik tentang raga di KBBI. Raga tidak hanya berarti tubuh seperti yang biasa kita pahami dalam olah raga dan jiwa raga. Raga juga dapat berarti keranjang buah dari rotan, bola sepak takraw, atau dalam bahasa Dayak raga berarti satuan potongan daging yang agak besar. Kesemua  pengertian itu menyiratkan raga sebagai upaya aktif berdaya cipta yang melibatkan alam. Nyatanya memang keberadaan dan keberlangsungan raga itu tak bisa lepas dari alam. Bagi masyarakat Dondong, Gunungkidul, raga mereka mengada dan bergantung pada keberadaan telaga. Sebaliknya, keberlangsungan telaga membutuhkan juga campur tangan raga warga. 

Simak pandangan batin @yohanes_leo27  dalam festival telaga Gunungkidul di web crcs ugm
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets by crcsugm

Universitas Gadjah Mada

Gedung Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM, 3rd Floor
Jl. Teknika Utara, Pogung, Yogyakarta, 55284
Email address: crcs@ugm.ac.id

 

© CRCS - Universitas Gadjah Mada

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY

[EN] We use cookies to help our viewer get the best experience on our website. -- [ID] Kami menggunakan cookie untuk membantu pengunjung kami mendapatkan pengalaman terbaik di situs web kami.I Agree / Saya Setuju