• Tentang UGM
  • Portal Akademik
  • Pusat TI
  • Perpustakaan
  • Penelitian
Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • About Us
    • About CRCS
    • Vision & Mission
    • People
      • Faculty Members and Lecturers
      • Staff Members
      • Students
      • Alumni
    • Facilities
    • Library
  • Master’s Program
    • Overview
    • Curriculum
    • Courses
    • Schedule
    • Admission
    • Scholarship
    • Accreditation and Certification
    • Academic Collaborations
      • Crossculture Religious Studies Summer School
      • Florida International University
    • Academic Documents
    • Student Satisfaction Survey
  • Article
    • Perspective
    • Book Review
    • Event Report
    • Class Journal
    • Interview
    • Wed Forum Report
    • Thesis Review
    • News
  • Publication
    • Reports
    • Books
    • Newsletter
    • Monthly Update
    • Infographic
  • Research
    • CRCS Researchs
    • Resource Center
  • Community Engagement
    • Film
      • Indonesian Pluralities
      • Our Land is the Sea
    • Wednesday Forum
    • ICIR
    • Amerta Movement
  • Beranda
  • Wednesday Forum News
  • The Difference and Dialogue in Christianity

The Difference and Dialogue in Christianity

  • Wednesday Forum News
  • 29 June 2009, 00.00
  • Oleh:
  • 0

Christians must relate to non-Christians with love and respect, engage in a humbler dialogue, and recognize the truth and holiness imparted by the Holy Spirit to all religions. This was one of the viewpoints mentioned by Mega Hidayati during the Wednesday Forum held on June 3, 2009. The title of her presentation was ?A Muslim View of Inter-Christian Dialogue.?

Based on her experience doing sandwich program at the Union Theological Seminary in New York, Mega saw that in Christianity there are many different views. For instance, in the evangelical debate, there are two dominant and different views which are exclusivism and inclusivism. She said that the exclusivists position Jesus Christ more as above all beliefs, while the inclusivists, including pluralists, deny the unique divinity or authority above everything.

Besides exclusive and inclusive views, for Mega there are also progressive perspective, radical particularism and Pentecostal. She mentioned that each of them has perspectives and / or claims which are different with each other, especially when it is related to Christian life and other communities or adherents.

Because of their different perspectives and / or claims, Mega questioned each of them in relation to dialogue which is needed to be built within them. For example, for the evangelical, who can tell us exactly which one is true and which one is false? What is the measurement for this? For the progressive, as progressive Christians, if Christians believe in Jesus as God incarnate, and if in fact your belief is just actually a metaphor, where will Christians turn to? What will this do to Christianity? Does this presume that Christianity is ultimately a metaphor for a moral life and nothing more?

Based on the above-mentioned argument, Mega saw that we tend to be more intolerant of the other within than the other outside. Therefore, intra-Christian dialogue is needed to bring peace and reconciliation among Christians, and all people from different faiths. Related to this statement, in reference to Mahmoud Ayoub, one of problems or obstacles in Christian-Muslim dialogue is the ?inability to accept other faith on their own terms?

After her presentation, one participant responded. The responder said that there is a mistake in seeing Christian life and give categories as mentioned above. He continued saying that there are no such things as evangelist, pluralist, exclusivist, progressivist etc. which are applied in any Christians. He said that someone can be an exclusivist, inclusivist, or a progressivist etc all at the same time because of the teachings and experiences s/he understands.

The contexts or existences of Christians have also to be considered because they create different atmospheres for dialogue or relation, especially when there are classes or other fundamental differences among them. Relations or dialogue within Christian academe, for example, influence discourses and attitudes which are built within them. This will be different from other people who build dialogue in their daily or ordinary life with other Christians or other adherents.

[MEGA HIDAYATI is an ICRS student who earned her master?s degree from CRCS UGM. Her research (thesis) was on Human Finitude and Interreligious Dialogue: A Discussion on Hans-Georg Gadamer?s Thoughts. Mega just finished her Sandwich Program, a semester studied at Union Theological Seminary, New York City, New York. She was involved with the conference on Gender, Post-Colonialism and Interfaith Movements, New York, October, 24-25, 2009. She also spoke on several workshop and group discussion on interfaith dialogue.]

Abstract of the presentation can be seen on this link:

https://crcs.ugm.ac.id/news.php?news_id=180

(JMI)

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Instagram

vasudaiva kutubakam selamat menghayati catur brat vasudaiva kutubakam

selamat menghayati catur brata nyepi
SUAR(U)A(NG) Di antara gema takbir dan sunyi nyepi SUAR(U)A(NG)
Di antara gema takbir dan sunyi nyepi, kita belajar satu hal yang jarang diakui: yang sakral tidak selalu saling memahami. Di titik itu, iman tidak hanya soal percaya, tetapi juga soal berbagi ruang. Rahajeng lailatul nyepi.
NYALI Nyali kerap dipahami sebagai sesuatu yang me NYALI
Nyali kerap dipahami sebagai sesuatu yang meledak-ledak. Seolah ia hadir dalam bentuk teriakan, gebrakan meja, atau keberanian untuk menantang secara dramatis. Padahal, nyali justru seringkali bersembunyi di tempat yang sunyi, pada sebuah jeda yang membuat seseorang terus berjalan dalam iman dan keadilan. Seperti para pemuka agama yang ditukil dan didongengkan oleh @nf_nuzula , Melalui sosok-sosok tersebut, nyali menemukan bentuknya yang hakiki: keberpihakan. Nyali merekalah yang membuat nyala agama tetap ada di hati rakyat dan mereka yang tertindas.
M E R A H Merah itu mencolok, laiknya luka yang ta M E R A H
Merah itu mencolok, laiknya luka yang tak sempat disembunyikan. Salib-salib merah suku Awyu berdiri di tanah yang hendak dirampas. Ia menjadi tanda bahwa ada yang sedang dipertahankan, sekaligus yang perlahan coba dihilangkan. Merah bukan sekadar warna iman. Ia berubah menjadi bahasa tentang kehilangan, tentang klaim atas ruang, dan tentang ingatan yang menolak dihapus diam-diam. 
Simak ulasan @tropicalboi tentang perlawanan masyarakat adat Awyu melalui kreativitas beragama, hanya di situs web crcs.
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets by crcsugm

Universitas Gadjah Mada

Gedung Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM, 3rd Floor
Jl. Teknika Utara, Pogung, Yogyakarta, 55284
Email address: crcs@ugm.ac.id

 

© CRCS - Universitas Gadjah Mada

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY