• Tentang UGM
  • Portal Akademik
  • Pusat TI
  • Perpustakaan
  • Penelitian
Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • About Us
    • About CRCS
    • Vision & Mission
    • People
      • Faculty Members and Lecturers
      • Staff Members
      • Students
      • Alumni
    • Facilities
    • Library
  • Master’s Program
    • Overview
    • Curriculum
    • Courses
    • Schedule
    • Admission
    • Scholarship
    • Accreditation and Certification
    • Academic Collaborations
      • Crossculture Religious Studies Summer School
      • Florida International University
    • Academic Documents
    • Student Satisfaction Survey
  • Article
    • Perspective
    • Book Review
    • Event Report
    • Class Journal
    • Interview
    • Wed Forum Report
    • Thesis Review
    • News
  • Publication
    • Reports
    • Books
    • Newsletter
    • Monthly Update
    • Infographic
  • Research
    • CRCS Researchs
    • Resource Center
  • Community Engagement
    • Film
      • Indonesian Pluralities
      • Our Land is the Sea
    • Wednesday Forum
    • ICIR
    • Amerta Movement
  • Beranda
  • Wednesday Forum News
  • Levinasian Ethics and Interreligious Dialogue

Levinasian Ethics and Interreligious Dialogue

  • Wednesday Forum News
  • 10 June 2010, 00.00
  • Oleh:
  • 0

For the weekly Wednesday Forum held on February 10, 2010, a schedule originally arranged for Prof. Mark Woodward, Mr. Roy Allan B. Tolentino, an ICRS student, discussed the “Levinasian Ethics and Interreligious Dialogue” instead. Mr. Ali Amin, MA, acted as moderator. Mr. Tolentino talked about the works of Emmanuel Levinas (1906-1995) which poses as a challenge to traditional ethical systems, in its radical reorientation of subjectivity. The presentation aimed to introduce Levinas and show his ethics that can inform inter-religious dialogue.

Roy divided his presentation into three sections, the first was about the short introduction about ethical theory, the second section was about the biographical sketch of Emanuel Levinas and the third was about the criticism toward Levinas’ thought in seeing interreligious dialogue. In the biography of Levinas and his thought, Mr. Tolentino explained that Emanuel Levinas was a traditional Jewish who was very intellectual. He began his philosophical studies with French Philosopher Maurice Blanchot and his study on Phenomenology under Edmund Husserl. In Germany, he met Martin Heidegger. Levinas became one of the very first French intellectuals who drew attention to Heidegger and Husserl. However, Levinas came to regret his enthusiasm for Heidegger because of the latter’s affinity to the Nazis.

Levinas thought that people’s responsibility for the others was already rooted within human subjective constitution. He argued that everyone would readily agree that it is of the highest importance to know whether humans are not duped with morality. Levinas maintained that subjectivity was formed in and through our subjected-ness to the other. By doing so, his effort was not to move away from traditional attempts to locate the others within our subjectivity. It means that human’s responsibility toward others was not a derivative feature of individual subjectivity, instead an obligation that finds our subjective being-in-the-world by giving it a meaningful direction and orientation.

Under Mr. Tolentino’s presentation, he gave the impression that philosophy is not difficult, lofty and esoteric, since he can clearly elucidate Levina’s thought about ethics in interreligious dialogue.

A lot of questions were addressed to Mr. Tolentino, especially the one when he was asked about how Levina dealt the contestation between individual subjectivity with collectivism in doing interreligious dialogue. What became the sensor and meaning of value in determining the truth in interreligious dialogue, and many other questions and inputs that were responded well by Mr. Tolentino.

Mr. Roy Allan B. Tolentino, or simply called Roy, is Filipino who is presently studying at ICRS as a PhD student. The Wednesday forum ended at 2:30 in the afternoon. The audience gave Mr. Tolentino a warm round of applause for his presentation. The paper he presented is a part of his dissertation research that discusses about Emanuel Levinas’ thought on interreligious dialogue.

(HAK)

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Instagram

crcs_ugm

Sedang tidak baik-baik saja, kamu biasanya mencari Sedang tidak baik-baik saja, kamu biasanya mencari apa di internet?

Banyak anak muda hari ini menemukan ketenangan, nasihat, bahkan jawaban atas kegelisahan melalui media sosial, konten keagamaan, akun kesehatan mental, hingga AI chatbot. Namun, bagaimana sebenarnya pengalaman itu terjadi?
Kami sedang melakukan penelitian untuk memahami bagaimana generasi muda usia 10–24 tahun mencari informasi keagamaan maupun kesehatan mental saat menghadapi masa-masa sulit.
Jika kamu merasa topik ini dekat dengan pengalamanmu, kami mengundangmu menjadi responden.
Partisipasi bersifat sukarela dan seluruh jawaban dijaga kerahasiaannya.
Kamu bisa langsung kirim DM jawabanmu atau mau tanya-tanya dulu juga boleh.

Kami tunggu ya.
Katanja koeliah S2 itoe mahal? Eitss , djangan s Katanja  koeliah S2 itoe mahal? 
Eitss , djangan salah
Bersama keempat mahasiswa angkatan 2025, kita akan ngobrolin djoeroes-djoeroes djitoe mendapatkan beasiswa di CRCS UGM

Begitoe?
Before petroleum fueled the world, it fractured th Before petroleum fueled the world, it fractured the archipelago

The raise of the colonial petroleum industry in the Dutch East Indies was also the emergence of new spatial inequalities. Outer Java was not merely discovered as a resource zone. It was politically produced as an extractive territory through imperial concessions, colonial state-building, and global struggles over resource control.

Join us in this presentation on capitalism, oil, and the colonial fractures that continue to haunt the geography of modern Indonesia. We provide snacks and drinks, don't forget to bring your tumbler. This event is free and open to public.
M B G Satu kotak makan berisi nasi putih pulen seb M B G
Satu kotak makan berisi nasi putih pulen sebagai sumber karbohidrat utama, dimasak dari beras medium pilihan, air, sedikit garam, dan beberapa tetes minyak agar tidak cepat basi. Di sampingnya terdapat ayam semur kecap, dibuat dari potongan daging ayam, bawang merah, bawang putih, kecap manis, daun salam, lengkuas, garam, dan sedikit gula sehingga memberi asupan protein hewani yang cukup untuk pertumbuhan. Sebagai pendamping lauk utama, disediakan tempe orek manis gurih dari tempe iris tipis, bawang merah, bawang putih, cabai, kecap, dan gula merah. Tempe ini berfungsi menambah protein nabati sekaligus membuat kotak makan tampak lebih penuh, sebab protein memang sering lebih meyakinkan bila hadir rangkap dua. Untuk unsur sayuran, ada tumis wortel dan buncis yang dimasak dari wortel segar, buncis, sedikit kol, bawang putih, garam, merica, dan minyak sayur. Warna oranye-hijau pada sayur ini penting: bukan hanya untuk vitamin A dan serat, tetapi juga agar foto dokumentasi tidak terlihat terlalu pucat.Sebagai pelengkap vitamin alami, satu buah pisang atau sepotong pepaya matang diletakkan di sudut kotak. Buah dipilih yang murah, tahan banting, tidak gampang memar, dan cukup fotogenik ketika dibagikan massal. Terakhir, ditambahkan susu UHT kotak kecil berbahan susu sapi, gula, dan fortifikasi vitamin, atau kadang telur rebus utuh sebagai penutup protein tambahan.

Berbuih-buih seperti pelaksanaannya ...
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets by crcsugm

Universitas Gadjah Mada

Gedung Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM, 3rd Floor
Jl. Teknika Utara, Pogung, Yogyakarta, 55284
Email address: crcs@ugm.ac.id

 

© CRCS - Universitas Gadjah Mada

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY