• Tentang UGM
  • Portal Akademik
  • Pusat TI
  • Perpustakaan
  • Penelitian
Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About CRCS
    • Vision & Mission
    • People
      • Faculty Members
      • Visiting Lecturers
      • Staff Members
      • Students
      • Alumni
    • Facilities
    • Library
  • Master’s Program
    • Overview
    • Admission
    • Courses
    • Schedule
    • Scholarship
    • Accreditation
    • Crossculture Religious Studies Summer School
    • Student Service
    • Survey-2022
  • Article
    • Perspective
    • Book Review
    • Event Report
    • Class Journal
    • Interview
    • Wed Forum Report
    • Thesis Review
    • News
  • Publication
    • Reports
    • Books
    • Newsletter
    • Monthly Update
    • Infographic
  • Activities
    • Film
      • Indonesian Pluralities
      • Our Land is the Sea
    • Research
      • Overview
      • Resource Center
    • Community Service
      • Wednesday Forum
    • International Events
      • ICIR
      • Interfaith Mediation
      • IGSSCI
    • Student Achievements
  • Beranda
  • Perspective
  • NU’s policy on ‘kafir’: Not new, but important

NU’s policy on ‘kafir’: Not new, but important

  • Perspective
  • 18 March 2019, 16.50
  • Oleh: Admin Jr
  • 0

NU’s policy on ‘kafir’: Not new, but important

Azis Anwar Fachrudin – 18 March 2019

Muslims should not have been startled by Nahdlatul Ulama’s (NU) recent call for an end to addressing non-Muslims as kafir (infidels). This opinion, arising from NU’s Bahtsul Masa’il (forum for religious problems) at its recent national conference in West Java, is not new. However, it is significantly important for the current religious state of affairs in Indonesia.

Many Muslims disapproved or even condemned NU’s appeal; yet it does not concern the word kafir in its theological meaning, but rather its use in today’s social and national life. The accusation that NU wants to amend the Quran, which uses the word in many places, is simply a display of ignorance.

What NU was reviewing was the medieval fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) discourse that recognized the category of kafir dhimmi, i.e. non-Muslims living in an Islamic state and entitled to the state’s obligatory protection in exchange for loyalty and payment of the specific per capita tax called jizya.

By paying jizya, non-Muslims during the caliphate era were given protection and exempted from military services, but had to accept some restrictions on their freedom of worship in the public domain, one which made them second-class citizens. Such a policy was not uncommon in medieval theocracies.

For NU, the concept of kafir dhimmi is no longer applicable in modern nation states, where all citizens are normatively equal regardless of their religion. This reasoning underpins NU’s proposal for the word muwatin (citizen) to replace it. Much earlier, the Ottoman caliphate passed a reform edict in 1858 which revoked the dhimmi status of non-Muslims living in its vast empire.

This idea had in fact long circulated within Indonesia’s progressive Muslim discourse early in the last decade, in discussions on the Egyptian prominent thinker Fahmi Huwaidi’s 1990 book Muwatinun, La Dhimmiyyun (Citizens, not dhimmi). Huwaidi’s critiques against the pre-modern fiqh should have been easily welcomed since they simply imply a confirmation of what has been already in practice by most Muslim-majority nation states, including Indonesia since its birth, in embracing the idea of equal citizenship.

What might feel new is NU’s urge not to use the word kafir to describe non-Muslims in public multireligious space. The word may be offensive to non-Muslims due to its theological meaning (in common understanding) of declaring its interlocutors deserving of hellfire for eternity. In the words of an NU intellectual, using the word ‘kafir’ to address non-Muslims may be tantamount to “theological violence”.

On this matter, NU’s fiqh argument, which is its Bahtsul Masa’il’s speciality, refers to the opinion of 16th century Hanafi jurist Ibn Najim, who stated that Muslims who addressed Jews as kafir were sinful if their addressees felt offended, making it tantamount to cursing or insulting (shatm).

The opinion has also been posed by today’s prominent Muslim cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who is revered by Indonesian Muslims inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood movement but who have ironically opposed NU’s position on the kafir matter. Al-Qaradawi had made the exact same call as NU in his 2004 book in Arabic, Khitabuna al-Islamy fi Ashr al-‘Awlamah (Our Islamic Discourse in the Era of Globalization).

Al-Qaradawi states that the Quran largely addresses non-Muslims using words such as “O, human beings”, “O, children of Adam”, or “O, people of the Book”. There are only two occasions when the Quran addresses non-Muslims using the words “O, kafir”; one in a story of the afterlife and the other when facing the Meccan pagans who had persecuted Muslims during the early years of Muhammad’s prophethood.

Qaradawi then argues that the Quran teaches etiquette not to use the word kafir to address or in the presence of non-Muslims, especially if they might feel offended by being called such.

In the 21st century, the same position had also been posed by India’s major Muslim organization Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind when in 2009 it urged Muslims not to dub Hindus kafir, with the exact same reasoning as NU’s, on the inapplicability of the category kafir dhimmi in the modern era.

While the medieval fiqh discourse made only two categories of areas, i.e. dar al-Islam (the abode of Islam) and dar al-kufr  (the abode of infidelity), the Indian Muslim organization referred to India as dar al-aman (the abode of safety/security). In the 1930s, NU had even already called the would-be Indonesia dar as-salam (the abode of peace).

All these suggest that mainstream Muslim intellectual discourse today has been increasingly critical of the applicability of several medieval Islamic jurisprudential concepts in the 21st century due to zeitgeist disparity. This is progress worthy of appreciation.

For today’s Indonesian context, that call by NU finds its important significance amid the increased lay Muslims’ awareness of the Quranic verse that may be interpreted as prohibiting the Muslim majority to be led by a non-Muslim, due to the massive 2016-2017 sectarian campaign of the Jakarta gubernatorial elections.

The popularization of this interpretation may erode Indonesia’s constitutional adoption of its equal citizenship concept, while the founding fathers had refused to include in the Constitution the provision that Indonesia’s president should be a Muslim.

Some may consider the appeal to stop calling non-Muslims kafir trivial, as hardly anyone would do so. But considering today’s situation in Indonesia, in which religion has played an increased role in shaping public discourse, NU’s attempt to give a theological grounding for equal citizenship deserves much support, not to mention the fact that it came from the largest Islamic organization in the world’s most populous Muslim country.

_____________

The writer, Azis Anwar Fachrudin, is a staff member of CRCS.

— This article was originally published at the Jakarta Post, 15 March 2019

Tags: Azis Anwar Fachrudin Nahdlatul Ulama

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Facebook

Facebook Pagelike Widget

Instagram

Almost all countries in the world have Chinatowns, Almost all countries in the world have Chinatowns, Indonesia is no exception. 

In fact, the relationship between the people of China and the Indonesian Archipelago has been going on for two millennia. It is only natural that Chinese culture strongly influences Indonesian culture today.

However, the character of Chinatowns on the Archipelago is as diverse as their history and relations with local communities.

Come and join the discussion at Room 306, Graduate School Building, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

#wednesdayforum is free and open to the public.
Jika sebelumnya kita mengulas tentang kegagalan id Jika sebelumnya kita mengulas tentang kegagalan ideologi pembangunan yang mengesampingkan pengetahuan adat, kali ini @ichuslucky berbagi cerita tentang bagaimana penduduk di Perbukitan Menoreh menggunakan pengetahuan adatnya untuk merawat mata air yang tersisa.

Simak ulasan lengkapnya di situs web crcs.
Tak selamanya pembangunan itu bersinonim dengan pe Tak selamanya pembangunan itu bersinonim dengan perbaikan dan kemajuan. Yang kerap terjadi justru sebaliknya, pemaksaan dan peminggiran mereka yang dianggap obyek pemeradaban. 

Simak ulasan lengkap menohok nan reflektif dari @andialfianx ini di situs web crcs ugm.
God save the king! Around 500 years ago, King Hen God save the king!

Around 500 years ago, King Henry VIII was awarded by Pope Leo X the title Fidei Defensor or "Defender of Faith" for his defense of the Catholic Church. He subsequently broke away and then declared independence from Catholic Rome, thus becoming the first head of the Church of England. 

Now, the title is inherited by Charles III who lead a kingdom that has seen both significant secularization and growth in non-Christian minorities over the last twenty years.

What the monarchy’s long relationship with religious plurality may look like under the new sovereign?

Come and join the discussion at Room 306, Graduate School Building, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

#wednesdayforum is free and open to the public.
Load More Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets by crcsugm

Universitas Gadjah Mada

Gedung Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM, Floors 3-4
Jl. Teknika Utara, Pogung, Yogyakarta, 55284
Email address: crcs@ugm.ac.id

© CRCS - Universitas Gadjah Mada

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY

[EN] We use cookies to help our viewer get the best experience on our website. -- [ID] Kami menggunakan cookie untuk membantu pengunjung kami mendapatkan pengalaman terbaik di situs web kami.I Agree / Saya Setuju