• Tentang UGM
  • Portal Akademik
  • Pusat TI
  • Perpustakaan
  • Penelitian
Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • About Us
    • About CRCS
    • Vision & Mission
    • People
      • Faculty Members and Lecturers
      • Staff Members
      • Students
      • Alumni
    • Facilities
    • Library
  • Master’s Program
    • Overview
    • Curriculum
    • Courses
    • Schedule
    • Admission
    • Scholarship
    • Accreditation and Certification
    • Academic Collaborations
      • Crossculture Religious Studies Summer School
      • Florida International University
    • Academic Documents
    • Student Satisfaction Survey
  • Article
    • Perspective
    • Book Review
    • Event Report
    • Class Journal
    • Interview
    • Wed Forum Report
    • Thesis Review
    • News
  • Publication
    • Reports
    • Books
    • Newsletter
    • Monthly Update
    • Infographic
  • Research
    • CRCS Researchs
    • Resource Center
  • Community Engagement
    • Film
      • Indonesian Pluralities
      • Our Land is the Sea
    • Wednesday Forum
    • ICIR
    • Amerta Movement
  • Beranda
  • Wednesday Forum News
  • Towards Better Disagreement: Atheists and Interreligious Dialogue 

Towards Better Disagreement: Atheists and Interreligious Dialogue 

  • Wednesday Forum News
  • 21 April 2021, 13.30
  • Oleh: CRCS UGM
  • 0

Towards Better Disagreement: Atheists and Interreligious Dialogue 

Wednesday Forum – 28 April 2021

Those identifying with religion and those identifying with atheism may seem locked in misunderstanding. However, against fierce rhetoric on both sides, common grounds for agreement can be found. Better disagreement between the two sides requires at least three things. First, a more educated and balanced understanding of the Other beyond strawman polemics. Second, the recognition that since neither religious nor atheist worldviews will disappear, a search for areas of cooperation is required. Third, a deep humility that acknowledges that as human beings we can never have certain knowledge, thereby avoiding dogmatic apologetics and developing appreciation for the voice of the Other. This presentation is based on my book Towards Better Disagreement: Religion and Atheism in Dialogue (2017).

Dr Paul Hedges is Associate Professor in the Interreligious Relations in Plural Societies Programme, RSIS, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. His research areas include interreligious studies, comparative theology, and theory and method in the study of religion. He has published fourteen books and over seventy academic papers. His two latest books are: Understanding Religion: Theories and Methods for Studying Religiously Diverse Societies (California University Press, 2021) and Religious Hatred: Prejudice, Islamophobia, and Antisemitism in Global Context (Bloomsbury Academic, 2021). 

The full poster of this event is available here.

Tags: Wednesday Forum

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Instagram

Much has been said about faith and ecology—but one Much has been said about faith and ecology—but one question often slips through the cracks: who is actually paying for it?
Behind every conservation effort, there are financial choices, priorities, and actors shaping what is possible. This talk with dives  into the often-overlooked terrain of sustainable financing in the intersection of religion, ecology, and conservation in Indonesia. 
Come and join in a thought-provoking discussion with @sofjandicky at UGM Graduate School building, 3rd floor. We provide snacks and drinks, don't forget to bring your tumbler. This event is free and open to public.
Kuliah itu SCAM? Apa sih bedanya SCAM versi anak Kuliah itu SCAM?

Apa sih bedanya SCAM versi anak CRCS UGM?
 #skill #connection #attitude #mindset #fyp
B A T A S Ada momen ketika agama hadir sebagai ba B A T A S 
Ada momen ketika agama hadir sebagai bahasa terakhir untuk bertahan. Seperti perempuan-perempuan di Sudan yang mempertanyakan apakah bunuh diri bisa menjadi jalan pulang yang lebih manusiawi daripada hidup dalam kekerasan. Ini merupakan situasi ekstrem ketika dosa dan keselamatan tidak lagi nyata dalam keseharian sementara dunia memilih diam. Pada titik itu, mereka memilih untuk berbicara "langsung" kepada Tuhan melalui jalan yang kelam.

Simak refleksi @safinatul_aula tentang bunuh diri dan agensi "kesalehan" di situs web crcs
A N G K E R Makam menjadi ruang pisah antara yang A N G K E R
Makam menjadi ruang pisah antara yang hidup dan mati. Mereka yang masih bernyawa melanjutkan cerita, mereka yang mati bersemayam di makam. Pada titik ini, makam memisahkan antara yang sakral dan profan, yang adi kodrati dan yang sehari-hari. Namun, makam juga menjadi ruang jumpa antarkeduanya. Yang hidup menceritakan ulang kisah yang meninggal sehingga mendiang terus mengada. Selama kisah diceritakan dan nama terus diumbulkan ke langit, selama itu pula mereka mengabadi. Karenanya, makam itu angker, sebuah jangkar yang menakutkan dan menautkan sekaligus. 

Simak catatan lapangan @yohanes_leo27 terkait makam di situs web crcs.
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets by crcsugm

Universitas Gadjah Mada

Gedung Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM, 3rd Floor
Jl. Teknika Utara, Pogung, Yogyakarta, 55284
Email address: crcs@ugm.ac.id

 

© CRCS - Universitas Gadjah Mada

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY